Enter Home Planet News Poetry of Issue #6         Memorial Page for Donald Lev
Table of

Matthew Paris

  I didn't feel like mourning when Evan Payson told me Don had died. As Don said to me: ”the beginning and end of life is a disaster; it's the middle that counts if anything does.” 

    Don lived a long life over eight decades exactly as he had wanted to live it. His body had been giving out on him for several years though initially it was nothing lethal. His eyes didn't work; he couldn’t walk up stairs and was barely functioning physically, partially because he never went to doctors. Don always was ready to take in what Nature had to offer him.      

“My father taught me two things: how to set type and how to drive,” Don told me. He was one of the last products of the old blue collar working  class world in which every child was directed by their parents to have some trade that could bring them into the adult world with competitive skills that would keep them from starving to death.

    It wasn't a world that cherished life unless it had some clear talent for survival.  Don suffered less than most people I’ve known who have had their innings with our contemporary institutions with their claims to value life because Don never paid much attention to them.      

Many people listening to Don talk in his thick New York accent weren't aware of how smart he was. What he said was often brilliant and epigrammatic. One should be able to see that level of intelligence and lapidary craft very well in his verse. If one were looking for classical models for his achievement, hardly one of Donald concerns, one might think of Martial or Horace. Don had the clarity and unsentimental quality of those late republican Romans.         

Many people of discernment accepted Don as a great man. He was all of that. 

One of Don's legacies if one wants such two-headed benefices is the chance to observe  in somebody we call great what at least some of the qualities of greatness might be. People do recognize greatness by intuition. They might not like it, they might b threatened by it, but they can sniff it somehow.  

    Most people are politic, secretive. They think it is a central virtue in  world they don't like or trust to offer as little as possible, nothing , or a domino disguise of who they are. They want to get in and out of life with the fewest wounds they can. 

    Don, and for that matter his mate Enid, were transparent. Neither one of them may ever have told a lie or put an acceptable spin on anything in their lives. People who don't appreciate greatness but have a certain dread of the world for good reason call this behavior childish. It's really character, honor, respect for the spirit of others as well. If Don accommodated the world at all it was only that he was clever and entertaining. He never bored anybody with the truth  

    If the world were what mediocrities think it is neither Don nor Enid would have accomplished anything of value, influenced or nurtured anybody . Would these supposedly more worldly people like to live in a world where nobody for the best of reasons were ciphers who never accomplished anything?  

    As a corollary one might see that great people think well enough of the world to offer themselves within it others t as citizens of Nature. People who are not great see their environment as deeply if sometimes elusively and clandestinely hostile. Don presumptively liked people, liked life, liked to be alive. He didn't go through any satanic reflections about it like Descartes or Carlyle. He was was at home in Nature.  

    Certainly thee enemy of any greatness is any organization that for its own purposes understandably would be happier if nobody were other than mediocre and circumspect even to a fault. It might be that we are all nascently great but that most of us out of caution or dread deny our greatness. One could never say that about Don. He never praised himself; he was if anything severely over-modest. Yet people reconciled in him something that wasn’t a principle he lived up to or anything external to him at all but his singular character pure and simple. Not telling lies can produce a lot of silence. Both Don and Enid weren't whiners. 

    Of course Don was a brilliant, independent and verbally clever man who had something we can all observe to apply himself to when he put his inner qualities to use. 

    Yet transparency, honesty and directness are not qualities that are virtues only of poets. they are the champions of an ontological fearlessness all life is born with, which at best enriches us all, an honor one pays to oneself which we all would do well to extend beyond our birth, even like Don to our death. They can help us to be charitable, intimate and convivial. 

    That is Don's deepest legacy.  

                               Matthew Paris

Jim Story

Let’s face it: a New York City legend has died.

One should say off the bat that Donald Lev was a truly first-rate poet with an inimitable style: intentionally provocative, thoroughly delightful, frequently humorous, and filled to the brim with a gentle irony.

But it’s about his generosity that I feel compelled to give testimony. His death is a blow to many, many of us who knew and loved him and were helped on our way to a writer’s life by that wonderful, generous soul. The first poem I ever read in public—forty-nine years ago—was at a coffee house gig organized by Donald, and the first “featured” poetry reading I ever had was likewise his doing. The first poem I ever published was in Hyn Quarterly (REMEMBER THAT!) in 1972, a litmag where he was the editor. Later on, when he was the editor of Poets magazine, he published my “Notes of a Forty-Year Old Country Boy” as the centerfold of one issue, which helped get them nominated for a Pushcart Prize. His doing. One of my first published short stories was in Home Planet News after he’d begun the journal that continues to this day, in the online version, under Frank Murphy.

When his wonderful wife—the utterly superb poet and co-editor of HPN, Enid Dame—died, I decided I would offer my services to help with HPN’s publication. So he made me—on the masthead at least—an Executive Editor, thereby greatly overstating my contributions to the magazine. That again was the kind of generous person Donald was. My main task for HPN was to read the many short stories that came in over the transom and to narrow the choices according to a witty scale which Donald designed. I remember that the last of the five boxes I was supposed to check (whichever applied) was labeled: “YUCK! IF YOU PUBLISH THIS I’LL NEVER SPEAK TO YOU AGAIN!” My second job was to edit, for a time, the book reviews for each issue. And maybe not even all of them; I just edited what he sent me. And for this he makes me Executive Editor? That was Donald.

And this barely touches on his role—over decades—as editor, organizer, publisher and distributor of the New York Poetry Calendar of readings. Nor of how he brought all of us HPN contributors together, periodically, at some Village haunt to celebrate, contribute, congratulate each other, and share our stuff. When it came to the Village and the subject was poetry, whatever needed to be done, Donald was there to do it. Despite needing to drive a cab to make a living. What a mensch. What a poet. What a force of nature. He will be sorely, sorely missed.